4.3 Article

Study on drug costs associated with COPD prescription medicine in Denmark

Journal

CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 328-337

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/crj.12010

Keywords

COPD; costs; Denmark; economics; prescription drugs

Funding

  1. Pfizer Denmark ApS
  2. Pfizer
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. GlaxoSmithCline
  7. Nycomed
  8. Novartis
  9. Allmirall
  10. Mundipharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionSpirometric studies of the general population estimate that 430000 Danes have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD is mainly caused by smoking, and smoking cessation is the most important intervention to prevent disease progression. Cost-of-illness studies conclude that the costs associated with COPD in Denmark are significant, but costs of prescription medicine for COPD were not analysed. ObjectivesTo analyse the societal costs associated with prescription medicine for COPD in Denmark. MethodsThe study was designed as a nationwide retrospective register study of the drug costs (ATC group R03) associated with COPD in the period 2001-2010. Data were retrieved from the Prescription Database, the National Patient Register and the Centralised Civil Register. The population comprised individuals (40+ years) who had at least one prescription of selected R03 drugs and who had been either hospitalised with a COPD diagnosis or had at least one prescription for drugs primarily used for COPD. ResultsThe study population comprised 166462 individuals of which 97916 were alive on 31 December 2010. The average annual drug costs (R03) were DKK 7842 (EUR 1055) per patient in 2010 with total costs of DKK 685 million (EUR 92 million). The average lifetime costs associated with COPD prescription medicine were estimated to be DKK 70000-75000 (EUR 9416-10089) per patient (2010 prices). ConclusionThe costs associated with prescription medicine for COPD in Denmark are significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available