4.5 Article

Analyses of drugs stored at home by elderly patients with chronic heart failure

Journal

CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 320-327

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0783-2

Keywords

Chronic heart failure; Elderly; Drugs at home; Medicines management; Healthcare costs

Funding

  1. Universitat des Saarlandes
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO 196]
  3. Deutsche Hochdruckliga

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy improves morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Medication adherence management is important for the effectiveness and safety of treatment. This study investigated drugs stored at home by elderly CHF patients. One hundred and one patients with stable CHF age a parts per thousand yen65 years were visited at home where a standardized interview and a thorough assessment of medication were performed. Mean age of the patients was 77.7 +/- A 6.1 years, 53 % male, mean NYHA functional class of 2.8 +/- A 0.7 and a Minnesota-Living-with-Heart-Failure score of 59.4 +/- A 28.6 points indicating reduced quality of life. The mean number of different drug packs per patient was 13.1 +/- A 5.5, corresponding to a mean indexed value per patient of a,not sign403 +/- A 48. Cardiovascular drugs accounted for 32 % of the packs. On average, 2.4 +/- A 3.2 packs contained medication that was not taken by the patient (18 % of the medication, mean indexed value a,not sign61 +/- A 8). Fifty-six percent of the unused drugs were prescribed by general practitioners, 23 % in the hospital, and 7 % by medical specialists and 14 % were over-the-counter drugs. Sixty-three packages (5 %) of the drugs at home were expired (mean indexed value per patient a,not sign12 +/- A 3). On average, elderly patients with CHF have to manage 13 different drug packs per day at home of which a significant portion is not taken as prescribed. New strategies are needed to support medicines management at home.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available