4.5 Article

Therapy to improve gestural expression in aphasia: a controlled clinical trial

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 55-65

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509343327

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess whether production of communicative gestures can be ameliorated by therapy, to explore factors that might influence individual variability of therapeutic success and to find out whether therapy effects generalize to unpractised gestures. Setting: Hospital department specializing in rehabilitation of patients with neuropsychological disorders. Subjects: Twenty-three consecutive severely aphasic patients received therapy; ten were tested repeatedly without interpolated therapy. Design: Twenty-four communicative gestures were divided into three sets of eight gestures. In the therapy group one set was practised during each of three consecutive periods and after that period changes in proficiency were assessed for all three sets. Comparisons were made between changes of practised and unpractised gestures during each therapy period within the therapy group, and between changes of unpractised gestures in the therapy group, and the changes brought forward by repeated testing in the control group. Interventions: Therapy was centred on familiarizing patients with the communicative functions of gestures and on improving the spatial precision of their gestures. Main measure: Scoring of gestures considered their accuracy and the necessity of assistance. Results: Therapy led to substantial improvement of practised gestures. There was also improvement of unpractised gestures which was significantly smaller than that of practised gestures but greater than the improvement induced by repeated testing in the control group. Conclusions: In view of the limited generalization, gesture therapy should concentrate on gestures that are relevant for communication in daily living of the individual patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
Article Rehabilitation

Is there a relationship between 'getting up and dressed' and functional and physical outcomes in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients? A quasi-experimental study

Rose Goonan, Edward Mohandoss, Celia Marston, Jaqueline Kay, Anurika Priyanjali De Silva, Andrea B. Maier, Esmee Reijnierse, Marlena Klaic

Summary: This study evaluated the physical and functional outcomes of the 'Ending Pyjama Paralysis' intervention in geriatric rehabilitation patients. The results showed that this intervention did not lead to additional functional and physical benefits in this setting.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2024)

Article Rehabilitation

The McKenzie Method versus guideline-based advice in the treatment of sciatica: 24-month outcomes of a randomised clinical trial

Sinikka Kilpikoski, Arja H. Hakkinen, Jussi P. Repo, Kati Kyrola, Juhani Multanen, Markku Kankaanpaa, Aki Vainionpaa, Esa-Pekka Takala, Hannu Kautiainen, Jari Ylinen

Summary: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a McKenzie Method intervention with guideline-based patient education in patients with sciatica. The results showed that multiple sessions of McKenzie-based back exercises combined with a patient's educational book had similar long-term effects to guideline-based advice. However, the small sample size and confounding factors limited the power of these results.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2024)

Article Rehabilitation

Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER) in patients admitted to inpatient geriatric rehabilitation

Margot W. M. de Waal, Michael Jansen, Loes M. Bakker, Arno J. Doornebosch, Elizabeth M. Wattel, Dennis Visser, Ewout B. Smit

Summary: The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation has been shown to be effective in evaluating physical and cognitive functioning in geriatric rehabilitation. A minimal important change of 14.5 points has been established for physical functioning.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION (2024)