4.5 Review

Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 2703-2725

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5

Keywords

Sealant; Restoration; Atraumatic restorative treatment; Survival; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development from the Brazilian Government [309521/2015-7, 306852/2016-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The aim of the present study is to update the results of two previous meta-analyses, published in 2006 and 2012, on the survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and ART sealants. The current meta-analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before. Materials and methods Until February 2017, six databases were interrogated (two English, one Portuguese, one Spanish and two Chinese). Using six exclusion criteria, a group of six independent reviewers selected 43 publications from a total of 1958 potentially relevant studies retrieved. Confidence intervals and/or standard errors were calculated and the heterogeneity variance of the survival rates was estimated. Results The survival percentages and standard errors of single-surface and multiple-surface ART restorations in primary posterior teeth over the first 2 years were 94.3% (+/- 1.5) and 65.4% (+/- 3.9), respectively; for single-surface ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth over the first 3 years, they were 87.1% (+/- 3.2); and for multiple-surface ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth over the first 5 years, they were 77% (+/- 9.0). The mean annual dentine-carious-lesion-failure percentages in previously sealed pits and fissures using ART sealants in permanent posterior teeth over the first 3 and 5 years were 0.9 and 1.9%, respectively. Conclusions ART single-surface restorations presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth, whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages. ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available