The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience

A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template

(2014) Marjolein Vercruyssen et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY

Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles

(2013) Megumi Ochi et al.   COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE

How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?

(2013) M. Cassetta et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: An in vitro study

(2013) Sarra E. Cushen et al.   JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY

Conventional Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for Computer-Assisted Implant Placement. Part I: Relationship of Radiographic Gray Density and Implant Stability

(2012) Volkan Arisan et al.   Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery

(2012) Richard Koop et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Computer-guided implant therapy and soft- and hard-tissue aspects. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012

(2012) Alberto Sicilia et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review

(2012) Margareta Hultin et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement

(2012) N. Van Assche et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning

(2012) Paul W. Poeschl et al.   Clinical Oral Investigations

Accuracy of Two Stereolithographic Surgical Templates: A Retrospective Study

(2011) Michele Cassetta et al.   Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Effect of Smoking Habits on Accuracy of Implant Placement Using Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides

(2011) Jan D'haese et al.   Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™ )-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study

(2011) Christoph Vasak et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Surgical Experience Influences 2-Stage Implant Osseointegration

(2011) Sumaia Ahmad Zoghbi et al.   JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY

Accuracy and Complications Using Computer-Designed Stereolithographic Surgical Guides for Oral Rehabilitation by Means of Dental Implants: A Review of the Literature

(2010) Jan D'haese et al.   Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Tolerance within a surgical guide

(2010) N. Van Assche et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

Root Contact during Drilling for Microimplant Placement

(2009) U-Hyeong Cho et al.   ANGLE ORTHODONTIST

A Prospective Study on the Accuracy of Mucosally Supported Stereolithographic Surgical Guides in Fully Edentulous Maxillae

(2009) Jan D'haese et al.   Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: anin vitrostudy

(2009) Jacob Horwitz et al.   CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH

The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy

(2008) M. VERCRUYSSEN et al.   JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION