4.6 Article

Automated artifact removal as preprocessing refines neonatal seizure detection

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 12, Pages 2345-2354

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.04.026

Keywords

Neonate; Electroencephalography (EEG); Artifact removal; Independent Component Analysis (ICA); Seizure; Seizure detection

Funding

  1. Research Council KUL [CoE EF/05/006, PFV/10/002, IDO 05/010 EEG-fMRI, IDO 08/013, IOF-KP06/11]
  2. Flemish Government: FWO [G.0302.07, G.0341.07, G.0427.10N]
  3. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office [IUAP P6/04, 90348]
  4. EU [FP6-MC-RTN-035801, COST-BM0601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The description and evaluation of algorithms using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for automatic removal of ECG, pulsation and respiration artifacts in neonatal EEG before automated seizure detection. Methods: The developed algorithms decompose the EEG using ICA into its underlying sources. The artifact source was identified using the simultaneously recorded polygraphy signals after preprocessing. The EEG was reconstructed without the corrupting source, leading to a clean EEG. The impact of the artifact removal was measured by comparing the performance of a previously developed seizure detector before and after the artifact removal in 13 selected patients (9 having artifact-contaminated and 4 having artifact-free EEGs). Results: A significant decrease in false alarms (p = 0.01) was found while the Good Detection Rate (GDR) for seizures was not altered (p = 0.50). Conclusions: The techniques reduced the number of false positive detections without lowering sensitivity and are beneficial in long term EEG seizure monitoring in the presence of disturbing biological artifacts. Significance: The proposed algorithms improve neonatal seizure monitoring. (C) 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available