4.6 Article

Novelty P3 elicited by the subject's own name in comatose patients

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 10, Pages 2224-2230

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.035

Keywords

P3; MMN; Novelty; Coma; Consciousness; Own name

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess patterns of novelty P3 elicited by the subject's own name (SON) in comatose patients and to compare SON novelty P3 prognostic value with that of mismatch negativity (MMN). Methods: A passive oddball paradigm, previously validated in healthy subjects, including duration deviants and SON presented as a novel was applied in 50 severe comatose patients on average 20 days after coma onset. The outcome was assessed 3 months after coma onset. Results: MMN to deviants was found in 14/50 patients and a central-parietal P3 to SON was found in 21/50 patients. In 12 patients, a parietal component (P3b) was also clearly present in the late part of P3. Four patients showed an MMN but no P3. Eleven patients had a novelty P3. with a late parietal component for 5 of them, but no MMN. The presence of a P3 was highly correlated with awakening. Compared to MMN, P3 showed as large a specificity for awakening (0.85). It showed a much higher sensitivity (0.71 versus 0.42). All but one patient with P3b woke up. Conclusions: The use of novelty P3 elicited by SON increases the prognostic value of MMN alone and improves the assessment of comatose patients by demonstrating the activation of higher-level cognitive functions in some of them. It shows that unconsciously perceived stimuli are processed and activate brain areas similarly to consciously perceived stimuli. Significance: SON as a novel in an MMN design can be used to increase the prognostic value of ERPs in comatose patients and to assess unconscious cognitive processes in uncommunicative patients. (c) 2008 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available