4.0 Article

Oculopharyngeal muscle dystrophy: fine structure and mRNA expression levels of PABPN1

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPATHOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 94-103

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/NPP30094

Keywords

oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (PMD); PABPN1 gene; GCG and GCA repeats; genotype; fine structural phenotype

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The underlying molecular mechanism leading to the OPMD causing mutation in the PABPN1 gene has not been elucidated so far. Two models are under consideration: the first model is the polymerase slippage mechanism. The second model is unequal crossing over. The aim of the present study is to correlate clinical, fine structural, and molecular genetic data. Material and methods: In 6 cases of OPMD, confirmed by electron microscopy, we analyzed mutations in exon 1 of the polyadenine binding protein nuclear1 (PABPN1) gene on chromosome 14q11.1 using DNA isolated from biopsied muscle tissue. Furthermore, the corresponding mRNA from frozen biopsies was analyzed. Results: In addition to the usual expansion of the (GCG)(6) sequence to the well known (GCG)(8-13) trinucleotide repeats in 5 of the patients, we detected a novel (GCA)(2)(GCG) insertion in one patient. This mutation favors a pathomechanism of unequal crossing over instead of a polymerase slippage model. Tubulofilamentous (8.5 nm) nuclear inclusions were especially prominent in an isolated nucleus of a nuclear clump in a severely atrophic muscle fiber. However, no correlation was found between muscle weakness, the frequency of repeats, and the frequency and size of nuclear inclusions. Conclusions: Muscle weakness was not obviously correlated to the number of repeats, but it is suggested that it might be linked to an increase of the transcription rate representing the ratio between mutated versus normal RT-PCR products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available