4.3 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid-orexin levels and sleep attacks in four patients with Parkinson's disease

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 341-344

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.11.007

Keywords

Sleep attacks; Excessive daytime sleepiness; Orexin; Pergolide; Dopaminergic receptor; Narcolepsy

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591097] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Sleep attacks (SAs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are rare, but clinically important because they significantly impair the daily lives of patients. Causes of SAs include long-term activation of dopaminergic (especially D3) receptors. Recent studies suggest that SAs in PD may be related to impairment of hypothalamic orexin neurons, similar to narcolepsy. Whether orexin is associated with long-term activation of dopaminergic receptors remains uncertain. Patients and methods: We measured levels of orexin in samples of spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 25 patients with PD, including 9 with excessive daytime sleepiness and 4 with SAs. Furthermore, in the four patients with SAs, the selective dopamine D1/D2 agonist pergolide was substituted for the causative drugs with D3 stimulatory activity, and CSF-orexin levels were measured before and after switching treatment. Results: In the 25 patients with PD, including the 4 patients with SAs, lower CSF-orexin levels were associated with a longer disease duration, which has been linked to a higher incidence of SAs. Switching treatment to pergolide significantly increased CSF-orexin levels and completely resolved SAs in the four patients with PD. Conclusion: Despite the small number of patients studied, our results suggest that orexin transmission is most likely involved in SAs in PD and that abrogation of D3 receptor stimulation may increase orexin and thereby inhibit SAs. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available