4.7 Article

Clusters of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones producing different carbapenemases in an intensive care unit

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 588-594

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01996.x

Keywords

Acinetobacter baumannii; carbapenemases; epidemiology; OXA-51; OXA-58; VIM metallo-beta-lactamases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During a 2-year period (April 2005-March 2007), 31 intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a Greek hospital were infected or colonised with imipenem-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Twelve patients died, with imipenem-resistant A. baumannii infection contributing to the death of seven patients. The 31 representative A. baumannii isolates were multidrug-resistant and clustered in four distinct clones, each of which contained different carbapenemase genes: clone I was predominant and contained bla(VIM-1), bla(OXA-58) and the intrinsic bla(OXA-66) gene; clone II contained bla(VIM-4), bla(OXA-58) and the intrinsic bla(OXA-69) gene; clone III contained bla(OXA-58) and the intrinsic bla(OXA-69) gene; and clone IV contained only the intrinsic bla(OXA-66) gene. ISAba1 was not associated with the intrinsic bla(OXA-51-like) alleles, whereas ISAba3 was found upstream and downstream of bla(OXA-58) in isolates of clone I, and upstream of bla(OXA-58) in isolates of clone III, but was not detected in isolates of clone II. PCR, curing and hybridisation experiments indicated that the bla(VIM) alleles were chromosomally located, whereas the bla(OXA-58) alleles were plasmid-located. This study provides the first description of the clonal spread of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii isolates carrying bla(VIM-1) and bla(VIM-4) metallo-beta-lactamase genes, and revealed that distinct carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii clusters bearing different carbapenemase genes may emerge and cause severe infections, even in a well-defined regional hospital setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available