4.6 Article

Habitual Physical Activity Measured by Accelerometer and Survival in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03660412

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectives The association between mortality and physical activity based on self-report questionnaire in hemodialysis patients has been reported previously. However, because self-report is a subjective assessment, evaluating true physical activity is difficult. This study investigated the prognostic significance of habitual physical activity on 7-year survival in a cohort of clinically stable and adequately dialyzed patients. Design, setting, participants, & measurements A total of 202 Japanese outpatients who were undergoing maintenance hemoclialysis three times per week at the hemodialysis center of Sagami Junkanki Clinic (Japan) from October 2002 to February 2012 were followed for up to 7 years. Physical activity was evaluated using an accelerometer at study entry and is expressed as the amount of time a patient engaged in physical activity on nondialysis days. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the contribution of habitual physical activity to all-cause mortality. Results The median patient age was 64 (25th, 75th percentiles, 57, 72) years, 52.0% of the patients were women, and the median time on hemodialysis was 40.0 (25th, 75th percentiles, 16.8, 119.3) months at baseline. During a median follow-up of 45 months, 34 patients died. On multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality per 10 min/d increase in physical activity was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.92; P=0.002). Conclusions Engaging in habitual physical activity among outpatients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis was associated with decreased mortality risk. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 2010-2016, 2012. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03660412

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available