4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Combination of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy on mesenchymal stem cell line treated with chloroaluminum phthalocyanine magnetic-nanoemulsion

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS
Volume 380, Issue -, Pages 372-376

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.098

Keywords

Nanobiotechnology; Magnetic nanoparticle; Phthalocyanines; Stem cell

Funding

  1. CNPq-PhD project [140998/2011-0]
  2. CNPq-RHAE project [350223/2012-2]
  3. PIPE-FAPESP project [2014/14231-7]
  4. Brazilian agencies
  5. FAPESP thematic project [2008/53719-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study reports On the preparation and the cell viability assay of two nanoemulsions loaded with magnetic nanoparticle and chloroaluminum phthalocyanine. The preparations contain equal amount of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine (0.05 mg/mL) but different contents of magnetic nanoparticle (0.15 x 10(13) or 1.50 x 10(13) particle/mL). The human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell line was used as the model to assess the cell viability and this type of cell can be used as a model to mimic cancer stem cells. The cell viability assays were performed in isolated as well as under combined magnetic hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy treatments. We found from the cell viability assay that under the hyperthermia treatment (1 MHz and 40 Oe magnetic field amplitude) the cell viability reduction was about 10%, regardless the magnetic nanoparticle content within the magnetic nanoparticle/ chloroaluminum phthalocyanine formulation. However, cell viability reduction of about 50% and 60% were found while applying the photoclynamic therapy treatment using the magnetic nanoparticle/chloroaluminum phthalocyanine formulation containing 0.15 x 10(13) or 1.50 x 10(13) magnetic particle/mL, respectively. Finally, an average reduction in cell viability of about 66% was found while combining the hyperthermia and photoclynamic therapy treatments. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available