4.3 Article

Hyponatremia among runners in the Zurich marathon

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 344-349

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31817e3515

Keywords

hyponatremia; exercise; endurance running; fluid balance; sodium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Hyperhydration and exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) are critical issues during endurance events'. We studied a cohort of marathon runners to examine EAH's prevalence in a marathon with a short time limit and to investigate underlying mechanisms that may be responsible for its development. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: 2006 Zurich Marathon (cool and rainy weather, time limit of 5 hours). Participants: 167 marathon runners were recruited the month before the race. Main Outcome Measures: Body mass, plasma sodium, and osmolality were measured just before the start and immediately after the race. Fluid intake during the race was ascertained by a recall questionnaire. Results: Five subjects (3%) developed asymptomatic EAH and no symptomatic EAH was found. Body mass change during the race correlated similarly with postrace sodium levels (r = -0.72, P < 0.0001) and with sodium change during the race (r= -0.66, P < 0.0001). Postrace sodium levels correlated significantly with sodium change during the race (r = 0.74, P < 0.0001). Fluid intake correlated significantly (r = -0.43, P < 0.0001) with plasma sodium change between the start and finish of the race. Postrace sodium levels and postrace osmolality were significantly correlated (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In this study we observed a relatively low incidence of EAH in subjects running the marathon in around 2.5 to 5 hours and in a cool environment. Plasma sodium change during the race and postrace sodium levels correlated with body mass change. There was also a direct correlation between fluid intake and plasma sodium change during the race.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available