4.4 Article

Prevalence and Impact of Pain in Adults Aging With a Physical Disability Comparison to a US General Population Sample

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 307-315

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829e9bca

Keywords

PROMIS; aging; pain; disability

Funding

  1. Department of Education, NIDRR [H133B080024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To describe rates of pain and pain interference in a large sample of adults aging with long-standing physical disabilities, relative to a normative US population sample. Methods: Self-report survey data was collected for a sample of 1877 individuals with spinal cord injury, neuromuscular disease, postpolio syndrome, or multiple sclerosis. Rates of pain severity and pain interference in these samples were then compared with those taken from a large normative sample (> 20,000) collected through the NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Results: Individuals with long-standing physical disabilities reported higher levels of pain and pain interference across the lifespan as compared with individuals in the normative sample. In general, individuals with disability did not experience an age-related decrease in pain and pain impact in contrast to those in the normative sample. For 3 disability groups (neuromuscular disease, postpolio syndrome, and multiple sclerosis), pain interference remained elevated and significantly higher than national norms in the postretirement period (ie, age 65 to 74). Discussion: Results from this study provide a large scale data on prevalence rates of pain and pain interference in this population. Findings underscore the prevalence and impact of pain in persons with disabilities and suggest that individuals with disability may not experience the same degree of decrease in pain interference in later life that is typical of the US population. Those aging with disability may be especially at risk for pain-related impairment in later life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available