4.7 Article

High Levels of Hepatitis B Virus After the Onset of Disease Lead to Chronic Infection in Patients With Acute Hepatitis B

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 57, Issue 7, Pages 935-942

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit348

Keywords

hepatitis B virus antigen; hepatitis B virus; genotype

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23590553, 24591002] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Some patients with acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection develop chronic infection. However, the method for identifying these patients has not been established. Methods. We followed 215 Japanese patients with acute HBV infection until the clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or the development of chronic infection. Levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA were serially monitored from the onset. Results. Of the 215 patients, 113 (52.5%) possessed HBV genotype A, 26 (12.0%) genotype B, and 73 (34.0%) genotype C. Twenty-one of the 215 (9.8%) developed chronic infection, with the persistence of HBsAg for >6 months. The rate of chronicity of genotype A, B, and C was 12.4%, 3.8%, and 8.2%. Of the 21 patients, only 6 (2.8%) patients, including 5 with genotype A, failed to clear HBsAg within 12 months. Levels of HBsAg at 12 weeks and HBV DNA at 4 weeks were useful for distinguishing the patients who became chronic from those who did not (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Likewise, the levels of HBsAg at 12 weeks and HBV DNA at 8 weeks were useful for discriminating between the patients who lost HBsAg within 12 months and those who did not (P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). Conclusions. In acute HBV infection, clearance of HBV may happen between 6 and 12 months from the onset. Only those who fail to clear HBV within 12 months from the onset may develop chronic infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available