4.4 Article

Immediate Postextractive Dental Implant Placement with Immediate Loading on Four Implants for Mandibular-Full-Arch Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Analysis

Journal

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 332-340

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00412.x

Keywords

dental implants; full-arch prosthesis; immediate loading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To date, only few studies have reported on the clinical outcomes of immediate postextraction implant placement and immediate loading. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the results of immediately loading four implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the mandible after a follow-up of 24months. Materials and Methods: Between January 2001 and January 2009, 50 patients (28 women and 22 men, average age 54years), had 347 teeth extracted and a total of 200 dental implants placed in the mandible. The patients received a provisional fixed bridge the same day and a permanent one 3months later. Clinical checkups were performed after 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24months. Marginal bone measurements were made in intraoral radiographs taken 1day after surgery and after 1year. A questionnaire was used to evaluate self-perceived factors related to comfort, aesthetics, and function. Results: All bridges were stable and no implant failures were recorded during the follow-up, giving a survival rate of 100%, at 2years. The marginal bone loss amounted to 1.33 +/- 0.36mm after 1year and 1.48 +/- 0.39mm after 2years. Ten patients showed prosthetic complications with the provisional bridge, but all the definitive prostheses remained stable throughout the study period without any complications. The patients reported satisfaction with the treatment. Conclusions: The present retrospective study showed that immediate loading of four implants immediately placed in extraction sockets is a valid treatment modality for the totally edentulous mandible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available