4.4 Article

One-Year Outcomes of Neoss Bimodal Implants. A Prospective Clinical, Radiographic, and RFA Study

Journal

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 313-320

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00273.x

Keywords

clinical follow-up; ental implants; radiography; resonance frequency analysis; two-stage technique

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Neoss implant system has been available since 2004. Few studies documenting the clinical performance of this implant are available. Purpose: To study the stability and clinical/radiographic outcomes of Neoss implants 1 year of loading when using a two-stage protocol. Materials and Methods: Ninety (90) consecutive patients scheduled for implant treatment using a two-stage procedure were enrolled in a prospective follow-up study. A total of 218 implants (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK) in diameters of 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 mm and in lengths from 7 to 15 mm were placed to support 29 single tooth replacements, 53 partial bridges, 5 full bridges, and 10 overdentures in both jaws. Abutment connection was made after a healing period of 34 months. The patients were followed during 1 year of loading with clinical, radiographic, and resonance frequency analysis (Osstell Mentor (TM), Osstell AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) examinations. Prostheses were removed at the annual check-up for individual testing of implant stability. Results: Three implant failures were experienced, giving a survival rate of 98.6% after 1 year. A mean bone loss of 0.6 mm (SD 0.8) was observed after 1 year. There was a significant inverse correlation between implant diameter and marginal bone loss (p < .003). The mean implant stability quotient levels were 73.7 (SD 7.6), 74.4 (SD 6.4), and 76.7 (SD 5.2) at placement, abutment connection, and first annual check-up, respectively. The stability had increased significantly from placement to 1 year (p < .001) and from abutment to 1 year (p < .0001). Implant stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla at all time points. There was a significant correlation between bone quality and stability at placement (p < .0001) and abutment connection (p < .001) but not after 1 year. Conclusions: The use of Neoss implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of consecutive edentate patients with different needs resulted in predictable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year of loading. Implant stability measurements revealed a favorable bone tissue reaction to the implants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study on Hydrophilic Dental Implants Placed with and without Bone Augmentation Procedures

Thomas Zumstein, Lars Sennerby

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2016)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Two Different Implant Designs and Impact of Related Drilling Protocols on Primary Stability in Different Bone Densities: An In Vitro Comparison Study

Lars Sennerby, Luca Pagliani, Anders Petersson, Damiano Verrocchi, Stefano Volpe, Peter Andersson

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2015)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants

Tomas Albrektsson, Bruno Chrcanovic, Per-Olov Ostman, Lars Sennerby

PERIODONTOLOGY 2000 (2017)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes

Stefan Lundgren, Giovanni Cricchio, Mats Hallman, Mans Jungner, Lars Rasmusson, Lars Sennerby

PERIODONTOLOGY 2000 (2017)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri-implant health and disease

Pierluigi Coli, Veronique Christiaens, Lars Sennerby, Hugo De Bruyn

PERIODONTOLOGY 2000 (2017)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions

Daniel Buser, Lars Sennerby, Hugo De Bruyn

PERIODONTOLOGY 2000 (2017)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A Retrospective Study on Immediate Placement of Neoss Implants with Early Loading of Full-Arch Bridges

Peter Andersson, Werner Degasperi, Damiano Verrocchi, Lars Sennerby

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2015)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability

Lars Sennerby, Peter Andersson, Luca Pagliani, Claudio Giani, Giacomo Moretti, Massimo Molinari, Alessandro Motroni

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2015)

Review Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Bone loss around oral and orthopedic implants: An immunologically based condition

Tomas Albrektsson, William Becker, Pierluigi Coli, Torsten Jemt, Johan Molne, Lars Sennerby

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2019)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Is Peri-Implant Probing Causing Over-Diagnosis and Over-Treatment of Dental Implants?

Pierluigi Coli, Lars Sennerby

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Factors influencing marginal bone loss at a hydrophilic implant design placed with or without GBR procedures: A 5-year retrospective study

Thomas Zumstein, Silvio Schutz, Herman Sahlin, Lars Sennerby

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Influence of diameter and length on primary stability in various implant site densities-An in vitro study in polyurethane blocks

Johan Gottlow, Lars Sennerby

Summary: This study investigates the influence of dental implant length and diameter on resonance frequency analysis (RFA), insertion torque (IT), and displacement (DP) measurements. The results show that implant length, diameter, and block density are significant predictors of the measured parameters. Implant length has a stronger effect on stability than implant diameter.

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2023)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants

Peter Andersson, Luca Pagliani, Damiano Verrocchi, Stefano Volpe, Herman Sahlin, Lars Sennerby

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2019)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A One-year Follow-up Study of a Tapered Hydrophilic Implant Design Using Various Placement Protocols in the Maxilla

Jakob Zwaan, Leonardo Vanden Bogaerde, Herman Sahlin, Lars Sennerby

OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL (2016)

Article Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine

A Randomized Case-Series Study Comparing the Stability of Implant with Two Different Surfaces Placed in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Immediately Loaded

Leonardo Vanden Bogaerde, Lars Sennerby

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY (2016)

No Data Available