4.2 Article

The Antidepressant Treatment Response Index as a Predictor of Reboxetine Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder

Journal

CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 277-284

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1550059414532443

Keywords

adult; biomarker; reboxetine; quantitative EEG; antidepressant treatment response (ATR) index; treatment outcome; major depressive disorder

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [5T32 MH073517-08]
  2. NIMH [1R01 MH085925-01, 5K02 MH001165-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes early during the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) could reduce suffering and improve outcomes. A quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) biomarker, the Antidepressant Treatment Response (ATR) index, has been associated with outcomes of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants in patients with MDD. Here, we report the results of a post hoc analysis initiated to evaluate whether the ATR index may also be associated with reboxetine treatment outcome, given that its putative mechanism of action is via norepinephrine reuptake inhibition (NRI). Twenty-five adults with MDD underwent qEEG studies during open-label treatment with reboxetine at doses of 8 to 10 mg daily for 8 weeks. The ATR index calculated after 1 week of reboxetine treatment was significantly associated with overall Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) improvement at week 8 (r = 0.605, P = .001), even after controlling for baseline depression severity (P = .002). The ATR index predicted response (50% reduction in HAM-D) with 70.6% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity, and remission (final HAM-D 7) with 87.5% sensitivity and 64.7% specificity. These results suggest that the ATR index may be a useful biomarker of clinical response during NRI treatment of adults with MDD. Future studies are warranted to investigate further the potential utility of the ATR index as a predictor of noradrenergic antidepressant treatment response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available