4.2 Article

Correlation Between Cognitive Functions and Nitric Oxide Levels in Patients with Dementia

Journal

CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 190-194

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/155005941104200309

Keywords

Cognition; Dementia; Event Related Potentials; Nitric Oxide; P300

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dementia is defined as a clinical syndrome characterized by acquired loss of cognitive and emotional abilities, severe enough to interfere with daily functioning and quality of life. Event related potentials (ERP) are sensitive to task variables that relate to cognitive behavior. They might be altered in patients with disorders of cognition such as dementia. Application of the P300 ERP component to the study of cognitive disorders provides a means of quantifying the level of mental impairment. At high levels, nitric oxide (NO), which is produced by microglia due to induction of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), is neurotoxic and may play a role in neurodegeneration. In our study an attempt has been made to record ERP in patients of mild and moderate dementia and to correlate their findings with nitric oxide levels in CSF and serum. Twenty patients with dementia were selected as cases and 20 subjects as controls, which were further subdivided according to the age groups. Both dementia cases and controls were assessed by minimental state examination (MMSE) and clinical dementia rating scale (CDRS) for evaluating the degree of dementia. It was observed that the MMSE score was reduced in demented cases. P300 latency was significantly delayed in mild and moderate cases of dementia. However, no change was seen in NO levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum in dementia cases and controls. A negative correlation was found between MMSE and P300 latency. Hence we conclude that cognitive impairment in demented patients is reflected in P300 latency but not in NO levels in CSF and serum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available