4.7 Article

Drug-Induced Vessel Remodeling in Bone Metastases as Assessed by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Vessel Size Imaging: A Longitudinal In vivo Study

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 3215-3225

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2932

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB-TR23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the antiangiogenic treatment effects of zoledronic acid (ZA) and sunitinib malate (SM) noninvasively in experimental breast cancer bone metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and vessel size imaging. Experimental Design: Nude rats bearing bone metastases after inoculation of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were treated with ZA (40 mu g/kg weekly; n = 8 rats), SM (20 mg/kg daily; n = 8 rats), or their combination (ZA and SM; n = 8 rats) and compared with sham-treated controls (n = 10 rats). Vascular changes in bone metastases were longitudinally imaged in vivo using DCE-MRI [ amplitude (A) and exchange rate coefficient (k(ep))] and vessel size imaging [ blood volume (BV) and vessel size index (VI)]. In addition, antiresorptive and antitumor changes were assessed in these lesions by flat-panel volumetric computed tomography as well as morphologic MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging. Results: In bone metastases, significant changes in A, kep, BV, and VI in accordance with decreased blood volume and vessel permeability as well as with increased mean vessel diameters were observed after application of ZA and SM as compared with controls. In this longitudinal study, antiangiogenic changes preceded the inhibition of osteolysis and antitumor effects after treatment. Conclusions: These results indicate vessel remodeling in breast cancer bone metastases on ZA and SM treatment and implicate substantial effects on imaging and treatment of malignant bone lesions. Clin Cancer Res; 16(12); 3215-25. (C)2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available