4.7 Article

Phase II Trial of Ixabepilone Administered Daily for Five Days in Children and Young Adults with Refractory Solid Tumors: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 750-754

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1906

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [U10 CA 98543]
  2. NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Ixabepilone is a microtubule-stabilizing agent with activity in adult solid tumors and in pediatric tumor xenograft models that are resistant to paclitaxel. The maximum tolerated dose on the daily-for-5-days i.v. schedule was 6 mg/m(2)/dose in adults and 8 mg/m(2)/dose in children, and the primary dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia. This study aimed to determine the response rate to ixabepilone in six solid tumor strata in children and young adults. Experimental Design: We conducted a phase II trial of ixabepilone (8 mg/m(2)/dose for 5 days every 21 days) using a two-stage design in taxane-naive children and young adults with treatment-refractory, measurable rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma family tumors, osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, neuroblastoma, and Wilms tumor. Results: Sixty-one eligible patients (36 male) were enrolled. Median (range) age was 13 years (range, 336). Fifty-nine patients were fully evaluable for toxicity and response. DLTs, most commonly myelosuppression, occurred in 11 patients (15% incidence in 3-18 years old and 33% in 19-36 years old; P = 0.2) during cycle 1. The median (range) number of cycles was 2 (range, 1-38). No partial or complete responses (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) were observed. Seven patients received >= 3 cycles, and two had prolonged stable disease (Wilms' tumor, 38 cycles; synovial sarcoma, 8 cycles). Conclusions: Ixabepilone at 8 mg/m(2)/dose daily for 5 days was tolerable in children and adolescents, but did not show evidence of clinical activity in the childhood solid tumors studied. Clin Cancer Res; 16(2); 750-4. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available