4.7 Article

Focal adhesion kinase expression in human neuroblastoma: Immunohistochemical and real-time PCR analyses

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 3299-3305

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1511

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K08CA118178] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase important in signaling between cells and their extracellular matrix. Studies have shown that FAK expression is up-regulated in several human tumors and is related to tumor progression. We recently found an increase in p125(FAK) expression in human neuroblastoma cells lines and wished to determine its expression in human neuroblastoma specimens and evaluate for a possible correlation between p125(FAK) expression and known prognostic factors for neuroblastoma. We hypothesized that p125(FAK) expression would be up-regulated in advanced human neuroblastomas. Experimental Design: Using immunohistochemical techniques with monoclonal antibody 4.47 specific for p125(FAK) expression, we analyzed 70 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human neuroblastoma specimens for p125(FAK) staining. In addition, real-time PCR was used to determine the abundance of FAK mRNA in 17 matched human neuroblastoma mRNA specimens. Results: FAK staining was present in 51 of the 70 tumor specimens (73%). Immunohistochemical staining of p125(FAK) in the ganglion-type tumor cells correlated with advanced International Neuroblastoma Staging System tumor stages and FAK mRNA abundance. In addition, p125(FAK) staining was significantly increased in stage IV tumors with amplification of the N-MYC oncogene. Conclusions: These novel findings provide evidence that FAK is expressed by advanced-stage neuroblastoma and provide a rationale for targeting FAK in the treatment of this tumor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available