4.5 Article

Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression measurement in uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma tumors

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 4-5, Pages 368-371

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.001

Keywords

Uterine sarcoma; Carcinosarcoma; Reference genes; Gene expression; qRT-PCR

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN 407 125 937]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To date no suitable reference genes have been identified in carcinosarcomas and non-epithelial malignant tumors of corpus uteri for normalizing real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays. The purpose of this study was to select appropriate references for gene expression studies in these tumors. Materials and methods: We used RNA extracts from 75 tissue samples, representing 50 tumors and 25 fragments of normal uterine tissues obtained from 50 patients treated for mixed tumors, smooth muscle sarcoma and stromal sarcoma of the uterus. qRT-PCR for five potential reference (housekeeping) genes, namely B2M, HMBS, HPRT1, TBP and UBC, was performed. The expression stability of these genes was assayed using geNorm software application. Results: The analysis of gene expression data with geNorm identified HPRT1 as the most stable reference gene, followed by UBC and HMBS, for all the investigated tissues. When stratified by disease, the results still pointed at HPRT1 as the gene that retained the greatest robustness in mixed tumors as well as in smooth muscle and stromal sarcomas. Conclusions: Our work is the first report on reference gene selection for qRT-PCR applications in mixed tumors, smooth muscle sarcoma and stromal sarcoma of the uterus. A ranking of candidate genes' stability values for the three types of tumors is provided and might serve as a valuable guide for future gene expression studies of these rare entities. (C) 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available