4.5 Article

Paraoxonase activity in healthy, diabetic, and hemodialysis patients

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 470-474

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.005

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Hemodialysis; Vitamin E; PON1; MDA

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) is mainly complexed to HDL and is responsible, at least in part, for their antioxidant properties. The aims of our study were to determine the phenotype distribution and enzymatic activities of PON1 and the oxidative stress status of healthy subjects and diabetic and hemodialysis patients. Design and methods: PON1 paraoxonase and arylesterase activities and oxidative stress markers [malondialdehyde (MDA) and vitamin E levels] were measured in 300 individuals as a function of health status. Results: The prevalence of the PON1 phenotypes in the study population was 74.51%, 18.15% and 7.34% for QQ QR and RR, respectively. The phenotype distribution did not change significantly as a function of health status (healthy, diabetes, hemodialysis). However, the hemodialysis patients had lower PON1 paraoxonase and arylesterase activities than the diabetic patients and healthy subjects, while there were no significant differences between the diabetic patients and the healthy subjects. Oxidative stress markers (MDA levels and vitamin E/cholesterol ratio) were significantly higher in the diabetic and hemodialysis patients than in the healthy subjects. Conclusions: The lower plasma PON1 enzymatic activities in the hemodialysis patients was not associated with a difference in the phenotype distribution of PON1. Oxidative stress conditions were significantly higher in these patients, which may increase the risk of atherosclerosis in this population. (C) 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available