4.5 Article

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor forms in plasma as markers of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability

Journal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 43, Issue 1-2, Pages 124-130

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.09.028

Keywords

Atherosclerosis; uPAR; Plaque; Carotid; Biomarker; Human

Funding

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
  3. AFA Insurance
  4. AstraZeneca RD Molndal
  5. Danish Cancer Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To test if circulating forms of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) are potential biomarkers of plaque vulnerability. Design and methods: Plasma concentrations of suPAR(I-III), suPAR(II-III) and uPAR(I) were measured by time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays in Caucasian patients operated for symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis (n=255). Local suPAR release from plaques into the circulation was assessed in plasma passing retrogradely over the plaque in the carotid artery, collected during surgery (n=7). Results: The suPAR(I-III) (P=0.03) and suPAR(II-III) (P=0.006) concentrations were higher after ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks, i.e., clinical subgroups associated with poorer prognosis and a less stable plaque phenotype, than after amaurosis fugax. Slightly elevated suPAR(I-III) levels were found in plasma from the carotid lesion. However, refuting the hypothesis, the concentrations of the suPAR forms were not higher in patients with short intervals between clinical event and blood sampling compared with those with long intervals. Age, inflammatory markers and diabetes were confounding factors independently associated with suPAR forms. Conclusion: Circulating suPAR forms are probably not useful biomarkers of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. (c) 2009 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available