4.5 Article

Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 40-46

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12360

Keywords

ciliary body; glaucoma; laser surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of micropulse and continuous wave diode transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. DesignRandomized, comparative, exploratory study in a tertiary hospital setting. ParticipantsPatients with refractory, end-stage glaucoma. MethodsForty-eight patients were randomized to either treatment. The intraocular pressure, visual acuity, number of medicines and repeat treatment were monitored for 18 months. Complications that include visual acuity decline, prolonged anterior chamber inflammation, phthisis bulbi, scleral thinning and ocular pain were noted. Main Outcome MeasureIntraocular pressure between 6 and 21mmHg and at least a 30% reduction with or without anti-glaucoma medications after 18 months. ResultsA successful primary outcome was achieved in 75% of patients who underwent micropulse cyclophotocoagulation and 29% of patients who received continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation after 12 months (P<0.01). At 18 months, successful outcome was 52% and 30% (P=0.13), respectively. The mean intraocular pressure was reduced by 45% in both groups (P=0.70) from a baseline of 36.5mmHg and 35.0mmHg (P=0.50) after 17.51.6 months (range 16-19) follow up. No significant difference in retreatment rates or number of intraocular pressure lowering medications was noted. The ocular complication rate was higher in continuous wave treated eyes (P=0.01). ConclusionDiode transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in both micropulse and continuous modes was effective in lowering intraocular pressure. The micropulse mode provided a more consistent and predictable effect in lowering intraocular pressure with minimal ocular complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available