Should we continue temozolomide beyond six cycles in the adjuvant treatment of glioblastoma without an evidence of clinical benefit? A cost analysis based on prescribing patterns in Spain

Title
Should we continue temozolomide beyond six cycles in the adjuvant treatment of glioblastoma without an evidence of clinical benefit? A cost analysis based on prescribing patterns in Spain
Authors
Keywords
Extended adjuvant treatment, Glioblastoma, Pharmacoeconomics, Pseudoprogression, Residual disease, Temozolomide
Journal
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 273-279
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-06-20
DOI
10.1007/s12094-013-1068-3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More