4.7 Article

Metabolites related to eGFR: Evaluation of candidate molecules for GFR estimation using untargeted metabolomics

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 489, Issue -, Pages 242-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.037

Keywords

Metabolomics; GFR; CKD

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Health (Science and Technology Department), Brazil
  3. FINEP, Brazil
  4. CNPq, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Metabolomics can be used to identify novel metabolites related to renal function and that could therefore be used for estimating GFR. We evaluated metabolites replicated and related to eGFR in 3 studies (CKD) and general population). Methods: Metabolomics was performed by GC-MS. The Progredir Cohort (n = 454, class 3 and 4 CKD) was used as the derivation study and adjusted linear regression models on eGFR-CKDEPI were built. Bonferroni correction was applied for selecting metabolites to be independently validated in the Diabetic Nephropathy Study (n = 56 macroalbuminuric DN) and in the Baependi Heart Study (BHS, n = 1145, general population). Results: In the Progredir Cohort, 72 metabolites where associated with eGFR. Of those, 11 were also significantly associated to eGFR in the DN Study and 8 in the BHS. Four metabolites were replicated and significantly associated to eGFR in all 3 studies: D-threitol, myo-inositol, 4-deoxierythronic acid and galacturonic acid. In addition, pseudouridine was strongly correlated to eGFR only in the 2 CKD populations. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate metabolites that are potential biomarkers of renal function: D-threitol, myo-inositol, 4-deoxierythronic acid, galacturonic acid and pseudouridine. Further investigation is needed to determine their performance against otherwise gold-standard methods, most notably among those with normal eGFR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available