4.7 Article

Lower carotid intima media thickness is predicted by higher serum bilirubin in both non-diabetic and Type 2 diabetic subjects

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages 161-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.029

Keywords

Bilirubin; Intima media thickness; Transaminases; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Funding

  1. Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation [2001.00.012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Higher serum bilirubin levels may be implicated cardiovascular protection. It is unknown whether the impact of serum bilirubin on carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, is different in diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects. We assessed relationships of IMT with serum total bilirubin in non-diabetic and Type 2 diabetic subjects without clinically manifest cardiovascular disease. Methods: IMT, total bilirubin, transaminases, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipid levels were measured in 40 predominantly middle-aged non-diabetic and 80 diabetic subjects. Results: IMT was higher in diabetic subjects compared to non-diabetic subjects (unadjusted, p<0.001), whereas bilirubin was not different (p = 0.82). In both non-diabetic and in diabetic subjects, IMT was negatively related to bilirubin (beta = -0.316, p = 0.045 and beta = -0.247 p = 0.014, respectively) taking account of age, sex and mean arterial pressure. In the combined subjects, IMT remained independently related to bilirubin (beta = -0.183, p = 0.028) after additional adjustment for diabetes status, alcohol intake, transaminases, CRP and lipid levels. There was no interaction of bilirubin with the presence of diabetes on IMT (p = 0.98). Conclusion: Carotid artery IMT relates negatively to bilirubin in non-diabetic and Type 2 diabetic subjects. The association of subclinical atherosclerosis with bilirubin appears to be unaltered in the diabetic state. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available