4.7 Article

Urine acylcarnitine analysis by ESI-MS/MS: A new tool for the diagnosis of peroxisomal biogenesis disorders

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 398, Issue 1-2, Pages 86-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.08.018

Keywords

Peroxisomal biogenesis disorders; Zellweger syndrome; Infantile Refsum disease; Tandem mass spectrometry; ESI-MS/MS; Acylcarnitines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patients with peroxisomal biogenesis disorders (PBDs) have an abnormal profile of circulating acylcarnitines (i.e. elevated C16:0-DC-, C18:0-DC-, C24:0-, C26:0-carnitine). We developed an ESI-MS/MS method for quantification of urine acylcarnitines and tested its reliability for the diagnosis of PBDs. Methods: Urine from 7 patients with PBDs (5 Zellweger syndrome, 2 infantile Refsum disease), from 2 patients with D-bifunctional protein (D-BP) deficiency. and from 130 healthy controls were analysed by ESI-MS/MS, using a multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) method, and quantified with labelled internal standards. Acylcarnitine levels between groups were analyzed by the STATA (TM) statistics data analysis and compared by the non parametric Mann-Whitney test. Results: In PBDs. the urinary excretion of long-chain dicarboxylylcarnitines (C14:0-DC-, C16:0-DC-, and C18:0-DC-carnitine), and of very long-chain monocarboxylylcarnitines (C22:0-, C24:0-, C26:0-carnitine) were significantly elevated compared to controls (p<0.0001). Interestingly, among PBDs the most severe abnormalities of acylcarnitine profile were observed in patients with Zellweger syndrome. One patient with D-BP showed similar abnormalities to PBDs, while in the other only C16:0-DC-carnitine was markedly elevated. Conclusions: This study shows that MRM ESI-MS/MS acylcarnitine analysis unequivocally discriminates patients with PBDs and D-BP deficiency from controls, representing a reliable and sensitive method for the diagnosis that requires a short-time analysis with high sample through-put. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available