4.6 Article

Examination of the global lorenz energy cycle using MERRA and NCEP-reanalysis 2

Journal

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
Volume 40, Issue 5-6, Pages 1499-1513

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-012-1358-4

Keywords

Lorenz energy cycle; MERRA; Hadley and ferrel cells; Energy conversion; NCEP R2 reanalysis datasets

Funding

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program of the Republic of Korea [CATER-2012-3082]
  2. Korea Meteorological Administration [CATER-2012-3082] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the global Lorenz atmospheric energy cycle is evaluated using the Modern Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the National Center for Environmental Prediction and the Department of Energy (NCEP R2) reanalysis datasets over a 30-year period (1979-2008) for the annual, JJA, and DJF means. The energy cycle calculated from the two reanalysis datasets is largely consistent, but the energy cycle determined using the MERRA dataset is more active than that determined from the NCEP R2 dataset. For instance, with regard to the annual mean, the general discrepancy between the energy components in the global integral is about 5 %, whereas the discrepancy between the conversion components is about 16 %, with the exception of C(P-M, K-M), which has a different sign in the global integrals. The latitude-altitude cross-section indicates that the difference in the energy cycle of the two reanalysis datasets is larger in the southern hemisphere than in the northern hemisphere. The conversion rates of mean available potential energy to mean kinetic energy [C(P-M, K-M)] and eddy available potential energy to eddy kinetic energy [C(P-E, K-E)] are also calculated using two formulations (so-called 'v center dot grad z' and 'omega center dot alpha') for the two reanalysis datasets. The differences in the conversion rate between the two reanalysis datasets for the global integral are not appreciable for the two formulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available