4.5 Article

Impact of Acute Gain on Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With Sirolimus-Eluting Stent - A Sub-Analysis Study From the STLLR Trial -

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 75, Issue 9, Pages 2113-2119

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0647

Keywords

Acute gain; Diabetes mellitus; Drug-eluting stent; Geographical miss

Funding

  1. Cordis, a Jonhson & Johnson Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Geographical miss (GM), representing suboptimal drug-eluting stent deployment, is associated with an increased risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and myocardial infarction. The impact of suboptimal stenting techniques on clinical outcomes in diabetics remains unknown. Methods and Results: Stent deployment Techniques on cLinicaL outcomes of patients treated with the cypheR (TM) stent (STLLR) is the first multicenter, large trial to prospectively evaluate outcomes associated with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) deployment techniques. Axial GM and longitudinal GM (LGM), defined as a balloon injured segment or a diseased segment not covered by a SES, were assessed by an independent core laboratory. One-year outcomes between diabetics and non-diabetics and their relationship with GM were assessed. This substudy included 1,336 patients, 28.8% with diabetes. In non-LGM patients, TLR was similarly low in both diabetics and non-diabetics (2.0% vs. 2.0%, P=NS). However, TLR increased 4.1 times in diabetics (8.0%) and 1.9 times in non-diabetics (3.8%) in the presence of LGM (P=0.03). Axial GM had no impact on outcomes. By univariate analysis, stent length, acute gain, and LGM were the predictors of TLR in the total cohort. However, by multivariate analysis, acute gain was the only predictor of TLR (P=0.03), independently of LGM or diabetes. Conclusions: Acute gain is the exclusive predictor of TLR after SES implantation. Particularly in diabetics, the negative impact of LGM on TLR seems to be amplified. Diligent SES deployment for larger acute gain is critical to improve clinical outcomes. (Circ J 2011; 75: 2113-2119)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available