4.5 Article

Effectiveness of Nocturnal Home Oxygen Therapy to Improve Exercise Capacity, Cardiac Function and Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 73, Issue 2, Pages 299-304

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-07-0297

Keywords

Dilated cardiomyopathy; Oxygen; Sleep apnea; Sympathetic nervous system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Central sleep apnea, often found in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), has a high risk of poor prognosis. Methods and Results This study involved 20 patients with CHF (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45%, M/F=19/1, age 65 +/- 10 years) and an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >5times/h who were divided into 2 groups: 10 patients treated with nocturnal home oxygen therapy (HOT) and 10 patients without HOT (non-HOT). All patients had dilated cardiomyopathy and underwent overnight polysomnography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and nuclear cardiac examinations to evaluate AHI, exercise capacity according to the specific activity scale and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold and peak exercise (peak (V)over dot O-2). Cardiac function according to Tc-99m-MIBI QGS, and the total defect score (TDS), H/M ratio and the washout rate (WR) on I-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging were calculated for all patients. As compared with the non-HOT group, the HOT group demonstrated a greater reduction in AHI (26.1 +/- 9.1 to 5.1 +/- 3.4), I-123-MIBG TDS (31 +/- 8 to 25 +/- 9), and I-123-MIBG WR (48 +/- 8% to 41 +/- 5%) and a greater increase in the specific activity scale (4.0 +/- 0.9 to 5.8 +/- 1.2 Mets), peak (V)over dot O-2 (16.0 +/- 3.8 to 18.3 +/- 4.7 ml . min(-1) . kg(-1)), and LVEF (27 +/- 9% to 37 +/- 10%). Conclusions HOT improves exercise capacity, cardiac function, and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in patients with CHF and central sleep apnea. (Circ J 2009;73:299-304)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available