4.8 Article

Recurrent thrombosis and survival after a first venous thrombosis of the upper extremity

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 118, Issue 13, Pages 1366-1372

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748699

Keywords

risk factors; thrombosis; veins

Funding

  1. Netherlands Heart Foundation [NHS 98.113]
  2. Dutch Cancer Foundation [RUL 99/1992]
  3. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [912-03033| 2003, VENI 916.56.157]
  4. Leducq Foundation, Paris, France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - Little is known about the consequences of a first venous thrombosis in the upper extremity. We studied the incidence of, survival, and risk factors for recurrence in a follow-up study. Methods and Results - We followed up 224 patients 18 to 70 years of age after a first venous thrombosis of the arm. Information was collected through anticoagulation clinics, the national death registry, discharge letters, and questionnaires. The median follow-up was 3 years, during which time 30 patients experienced a recurrent event, yielding an incidence rate of 43.2 per 1000 person-years. Survival was reduced: 55 of 224 patients died, which was 5.4-fold higher than age- and sex-adjusted population rates (standardized mortality ratio, 5.4; 95% CI, 4.2 to 7.0). The risk of recurrence was 2-fold higher in women than in men (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.9). A central venous catheter at the time of first thrombosis was associated with a reduced risk of recurrence. A body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2) and a first nonsubclavian thrombosis appeared to increase the risk of a recurrent event. Prothrombotic mutation carriers did not appear to have an increased recurrence risk. Conclusions - The risk of recurrence was high, with women, patients with body mass index >= 25 kg/m(2), and patients with a first nonsubclavian vein thrombosis having a higher risk of recurrence. Patients with a first venous thrombosis of the arm have a poor vital prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available