4.6 Article

Defective NK Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients at Diagnosis Are Associated with Blast Transcriptional Signatures of Immune Evasion

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue 6, Pages 2580-2590

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500262

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [DOC20100600956]
  2. Association Laurette Fugain [ALF/No2011/01]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [SPF20100518400]
  4. Institut National du Cancer [R09081HHA, RPT12008HHA]
  5. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris Translational Research Grant in Biology [RTB10002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that may be sensitive to the NK cell antitumor response. However, NK cells are frequently defective in AML. In this study, we found in an exploratory cohort (n = 46) that NK cell status at diagnosis of AML separated patients in two groups with a different clinical outcome. Patients with a deficient NK cell profile, including reduced expression of some activating NK receptors (e.g., DNAX accessory molecule-1, NKp46, and NKG2D) and decreased IFN-gamma production, had a significantly higher risk of relapse (p = 0.03) independently of cytogenetic classification in multivariate analysis. Patients with defective NK cells showed a profound gene expression decrease in AML blasts for cytokine and chemokine signaling (e.g., IL15, IFNGR1, IFNGR2, and CXCR4), Ag processing (e.g., HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, and CD74) and adhesion molecule pathways (e.g., PVR and ICAM1). A set of 388 leukemic classifier genes defined in the exploratory cohort was independently validated in a multicentric cohort of 194 AML patients. In total, these data evidenced the interplay between NK cells and AML blasts at diagnosis allowing an immune-based stratification of AML patients independently of clinical classifications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available