4.5 Article

Effect of Shengmai Injection on Vascular Endothelial and Heart Functions in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Diabetes Mellitus

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 281-285

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11655-008-0281-3

Keywords

Shengmai injection; coronary heart disease; diabetes mellitus; vascular endothelial function; heart function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the effect of Shengmai injection (SMI) on vascular endothelial and heart functions in coronary heart disease patients complicated with diabetes mellitus (CHD-DM). Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with CHD-DM, their diagnosis confirmed by coronary arteriography, were equally randomized into a control group treated with conventional treatment and a treated group treated with conventional treatment plus SMI. The changes in blood levels of nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II), as well as endothelium-dependent vascular dilating function and heart function in the patients were observed before treatment and after the 3-week treatment. Results: After being treated with SMI for 3 weeks, in the treated group, blood level of NO was raised significantly from 69.8 +/- 33.1 mu mol/L to 120.1 +/- 50.8 mu mol/L, and ET-1 was lowered from 70.1 +/- 32.1 ng/L to 46.2 +/- 21.3 ng/L, respectively (P<0.01); that of Ang II was lowered from 81.3 +/- 24.3 ng/L to 50.2 +/- 27.3 ng/L (P<0.01); brachial arterial post-congestion blood flow increasing rate was raised from 389.4 +/- 26.3% to 459.3 +/- 27.8% (P<0.01); and the improvement in heart function as seen through the ejection fraction (EF) was increased from 44 +/- 5% to 68 +/- 6% (P<0.01), all the changes being more significant than those in the control group (all P<0.01). Conclusion: SMI can improve not only the endothelial function in CHD-DM patients, but also heart contraction significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available