4.5 Article

Oxygen Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste in a Fixed-bed Gasifier

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1021-1026

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.06.026

Keywords

Municipal solid waste; Oxygen gasification; Temperature; Equivalence ratio; Gas flow rate

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB201505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51006023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four waste materials, paper, wood, textile and kitchen garbage, in municipal solid waste were gasified separately with oxygen in a fixed bed reactor. The yields of products char, tar and gas, the composition of gas components H-2, CO, CO2 and CH4, and the lower heating value (LHV) were examined at temperatures between 700 and 900 degrees C and equivalence ratio (ER) between 0.14 and 0.32. Characteristics of gas evolution during gasification were investigated. Results show that a higher temperature improves the formation of H-2 and CO while lowers the yield of CO2 and CH4. The LHV of syngas increases with temperature and varies in the range of 6-10 MJ.m(-3), reaching the maximum at 800 degrees C or above. As ER increases, both combustible gas component and LHV of syngas decrease while the yield of CO2 rises linearly. The appropriate ER for obtaining high quality gas is in the range of 0.18-0.23. Temperature and ER have significant effects on the product distribution. Higher temperature and ER are favorable for higher gas yield and lower yield of char and tar in the gasification of textile and kitchen garbage. At 800 degrees C, the gas evolution may be divided into two regions. In the first region, the flow rate of gas increases and then decreases rapidly, while in the second region the flow rate decreases monotonically to lower level. (c) 2014 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available