4.7 Article

Comparison of the Indices of Oxyhemoglobin Saturation by Pulse Oximetry in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome

Journal

CHEST
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages 86-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0057

Keywords

apnea hypopnea index; obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome; polysomnography; pulse oximetry

Funding

  1. China Medical University Hospital [DMR-97-029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To comprehensively evaluate the ability, and reliability of the representative previously proposed oxyhemoglobin indexes derived automatically for predicting the severity of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: Patients with a diagnosis 4 OSAHS by standard polysomnography were recruited from China Medical University Hospital Centre. There were 257 patients in the learning set and 279 patients in the validation set. The presence of OSAHS was defined as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) > 5/h. Three kinds of oxyhemoglobin indexes, including the oxyhenioglobin desaturation index (ODI), time-domain index, and frequency-domain index,, were used. Degrees of severity were AHI > 15/h and AHI > 30/h, representing moderate and severe OSAHS. A total of 28 oxyhemoglobin indexes were tested in our study. Results: Among the three kinds of indexes, ODI. had a better diagnostic performance than the time-domain and frequency-domain indexes, with the results coincident in the validation set and learning set. For predicting the severity of OSAHS with AHI > 15/h or > 30/h, the ODI clinically had the higher correlation with AHI than time-domain and frequency-domain indexes, with sensitivity/specificity achieving 84.0%/84.3% in AHI >15/h and 87.8%/96.6% in AHI > 30/h, respectively. Conclusions: Based on the smaller SEE of the AHI, the ODI had a significantly smaller SEE than the time-domain and frequency-domain indexes. The ODI index provided a high level of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity at different degrees of OSAHS severity. (CHEST 2009; 135:86-93)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available