4.7 Article

Potential combined hydrologic impacts of climate change and El Nino Southern Oscillation to South Saskatchewan River Basin

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 523, Issue -, Pages 34-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.043

Keywords

MISBA; SSRB; Climate change; El Nino; La Nina; Streamflow

Funding

  1. Alberta Innovates Graduate Student Scholarship
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. graduate teaching assistantships of the University of Alberta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A physically based land surface scheme, the Modified Interaction Soil Biosphere Atmosphere (MISBA) of Kerkhoven and Gan (2006) was used to assess the future streamflow of the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB) of Alberta under the combined impacts of climate change and El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Potential impacts of climate change on the streamflows of 15 sub-basins of the SSRB for the 2010-2039 (2020s), 2040-2069 (2050s) and 2070-2099 (2080s) were simulated by MISBA based on 30 years (1961-1990) of re-analysis data of the European Centre for Mid-range Weather Forecasts (ERA-40) adjusted with climate scenarios projected by four General Circulation Models (GCMs) for three Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) emissions (A1FI, A21, B21) of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Next, the combined impacts of climate change and ENSO are simulated by driving MISBA with the ERA-40 dataset re-sampled for active El Nino and La Nina episodes adjusted for climate projections of 2050s. Under SRES climate projections alone, MISBA simulated an overall decrease in streamflow for sub-basins of SSRB in 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s. While under a combined impact of climate change and ENSO, a further decrease (increase) in the streamflow of SSRB by 2050s was simulated if the climate anomaly considered was El Nino (La Nina). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available