4.7 Article

Short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer and prolonged ICU length of stay

Journal

CHEST
Volume 134, Issue 3, Pages 520-526

Publisher

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-0359

Keywords

cancer; ICU; outcome; prolonged admission

Funding

  1. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data on patients with cancer who have a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the ICU are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes of cancer patients with life-threatening complications with an ICU stay >= 21 days. Methods: A cohort study performed at a 10-bed oncology medical-surgical ICU from May 2000 to December 2005. Prolonged ICU LOS was defined as an ICU stay >= 21. days. Results: During the period, 1,090 patients were admitted to the ICU and 1.63 patients (15%) had a prolonged ICU LOS. These patients, however, accounted for 48% (5,828/12,224) of the total ICU bed-days. The hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 50% and 60%, respectively, and similar to patients with ICU LOS < 2.1. days (51% and 61%, respectively). ICU-acquired events and complications were common, and the most frequent were infections (90%), mechanical ventilation (99%), and need for vasopressors (88%). The number of organ failures, older age, and poor performance status were the main outcome predictors. The median long-term follow-up after hospital discharge was 5:37 days (range, 1.93 to 1,119 days), and 29 patients (18%) were alive. Conclusions: Fifteen percent of critically ill patients with cancer had a prolonged ICU LOS. Short- and long-term survival rates were reasonable,and the prognosis was better than expected a priori. In our opinion, the length of ICU admission per se should not he used in the clinical decisions regarding the continuation of treatment in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available