4.7 Article

Characterising the individual health risk in infants exposed to organochlorine pesticides via breast milk by applying appropriate margins of safety derived from estimated daily intakes

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 158-163

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.067

Keywords

Exposure assessment; Intake; Organochlorine pesticides; Margins of safety

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN404 026935]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Milk secretion being an important way of elimination of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) poses a concern due to potential risk for breastfed infants. This study aims to provide a tool for assessing such risks to infants exposed to OCPs (through accumulation in the mother's body), using calculated individual margins of safety (MoS). Selected OCPs included; p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDD, p,p'-DDE, beta-HCH, gamma-HCH and HCB which were analysed in 28 samples of maternal milk. The highest intakes were recorded for p,p'-DDE (at 2.90 mu g kg(-1) bw d(-1)) whilst the lowest was for gamma-HCH, (at 0.019 mu g kg(-1) bw d(-1)). For the risk characterisation purposes MoSs were calculated for the compounds for which toxicological reference values (e.g. ADI, TDI) were adopted. The MoS for average Sigma DDT concentrations was found to be relatively low (2.82) somewhat similar to that for HCB at 7.08, and for gamma-HCH, the MoS was substantially higher at 263.1. This, however does not take into account the extremely high individual concentrations. Thus, it was decided to calculate estimated daily intake (EDI) values based on OCP levels in individual milk samples. MoS levels of <1 (meaning unacceptable risk) were noted both for HCB in one sample as well as for Sigma DDT in 3 samples indicating likely threats to infant's health. The lowest MoS noted for gamma-HCH equalled to 60.6, indicating that this compound was not a threat to the health of any of the breastfed infants from the study group. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available