4.7 Article

The influence of mariculture on mercury distribution in sediments and fish around Hong Kong and adjacent mainland China waters

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 82, Issue 7, Pages 1038-1043

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.061

Keywords

Methylmercury; Mariculture; Sediment; Cultured fish; Fish feed

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research Fund (CRF) [HKBU 1/07C]
  2. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [SEG HKBU09]
  3. Hong Kong Baptist University [RC/AOE/08-09/01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study the influence of mariculture on mercury (Hg) speciation and distribution in sediments and cultured fish around Hong Kong and adjacent mainland China waters, sediment samples were collected from six mariculture sites and the corresponding reference sites, 200-300 m away from the mariculture sites. Mariculture activities increased total mercury, organic matter, carbon, nitrogen and sulfur concentrations in the surface sediments underneath mariculture sites, possibly due to the accumulation of unconsumed fish feed and fish excretion. However, methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations and the ratio of MeHg to THg (% MeHg) in sediments underneath mariculture sites were lower than the corresponding reference sites. The % MeHg in sediments was negatively correlated (r = -0.579, p < 0.05) with organic matter (OM) content among all sites, indicating that OM may have inhibited Hg methylation in surface sediments. Three mariculture fish species were collected from each mariculture site, including red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) and snubnose pompano (Trachinotus blochii). The average MeHg concentration in fish muscle was 75 mu g kg(-1) (wet weight), and the dietary intake of MeHg through fish consumption for Hong Kong residents was 0.37 mu g kg(-1) week(-1), which was lower than the corresponding WHO limits (500 mu g kg(-1) and 1.6 mu g kg(-1) week(-1)). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available