4.7 Article

Multiblock partial least squares regression based on wavelet transform for quantitative analysis of near infrared spectra

Journal

CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS
Volume 100, Issue 1, Pages 22-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.09.006

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Quantitative analysis; Partial least squares; Multiblock; Discrete wavelet transform

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20775036, 20835002]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of China [2008DFA32250]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiblock partial least squares (MB-PLS) method has been proposed for modeling the data set with large number of variables and for making the model more interpretable. In MB-PLS, the variables are split into several blocks containing different information, and the relative importance of the blocks is reflected by the super-weights of the MB-PLS model. In this paper, a weighted MB-PLS Coupled with discrete wavelet transform (DWT) method is proposed for modeling of the near infrared (NIR) spectra. In the method, the spectra are decomposed into blocks by DWT, and the relative importance of the blocks is estimated by both the super-weights and the block-weights determined by the prediction error of the sub-models in cross validation. Therefore. a practical approach to separate the variables is provided for MB-PLS and the relative contribution of the variable blocks to the prediction can be modulated adaptively. To validate the performance of the method. two industrial NIR data sets of tobacco powder and fragment of tobacco lamina are investigated, respectively. The root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP). the residual predictive deviation (RPD), and the correlation coefficient (R) show that the weighted MB-PLS Coupled with DWT gives a better predictive accuracy and interpretability compared with the ordinary PLS and MB-PLS methods. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available