4.6 Article

Revealing Unexpected Mechanisms for Nucleophilic Attack on SS and SeSe Bridges

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 3629-3638

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201203328

Keywords

bond cleavage; DFT calculations; diselenides; disulfides; nucleophilic attack

Funding

  1. DGI [CTQ2009-13129, CTQ2010-17006]
  2. Consolider on Molecular Nanoscience [CSC2007-00010]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reactivity of disulfide and diselenide derivatives towards F and CN nucleophiles has been investigated by means of B3PW91/6-311+G(2df,p) calculations. This theoretical survey shows that these processes, in contrast with the generally accepted view of disulfide and diselenide linkages, do not always lead to SS or SeSe bond cleavage. In fact, SS or SeSe bond fission is the most favorable process only when the substituents attached to the S or the Se atoms are not very electronegative. Highly electronegative substituents (X) strongly favor SX bond fission. This significant difference in the observed reactivity patterns is directly related to the change in the nature of the LUMO orbital of the disulfide or diselenide derivative as the electronegativity of the substituents increases. For weakly electronegative substituents, the LUMO is a sigma-type SS (or SeSe) antibonding orbital, but as the electronegativity of the substituents increases the -type SX antibonding orbital stabilizes and becomes the LUMO. The observed reactivity also changes with the nature of the nucleophile and with the S or Se atom that undergoes the nucleophilic attack in asymmetric disulfides and diselenides. The activation strain model provides interesting insights into these processes. There are significant similarities between the reactivity of disulfides and diselenides, although some dissimilarities are also observed, usually related to the different interaction energies between the fragments produced in the fragmentation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available