4.6 Review

Multiple Reaction Pathways in Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylations of Ketones

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 15, Issue 43, Pages 11515-11529

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200901594

Keywords

density functional calculations; hydrosilylation; kinetic isotope effect; rhodium; silylenes

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 623]
  2. Deutsch-Franzosische Hochschule (UFA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed density functional theory (DFT) computational study (using the BP86/SV(P) and B3LYP/TZVP//BP86/SV(P) level of theory) of the rhodium-catalyzed hydrosilylation of ketones has shown three mechanistic pathways to be viable. They all involve the generation of a cationic complex [LnRhI](+) stabilized by the coordination of two ketone molecules and the subsequent oxidative addition of the silane, which results in the Rh-silyl intermediates [LnRIII(H)SiHMe2](+). However, they differ in the following reaction steps: in two of them, insertion of the ketone into the Rh-Si bond Occurs, as previously proposed by Ojima et al., or into the Si-H bond, as proposed by Chan etal. for dillydrosilanes. The latter in particular is characterized by a very high activation barrier associated with the insertion of the ketone into the Si-H bond, thereby making a new., third mechanistic pathway that involves the formation of a silylene intermediate more likely. This silylene mechanism was found to have the lowest activation barrier for the rate-determining step, the migration of a rhodium-bonded hydride to the ketone that is coordinated to the silylene ligand. This explains the previously reported rate enhancement for R2SiH2 compared to R2SiH2 as well as the inverse kinetic isotope effect (KIE) observed experimentally for the overall catalytic cycle because deuterium prefers to be located in the stronger bond, that is, C-D Versus M-D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available