4.8 Article

Observation of TiH5 and TiH7 in Bulk-Phase TiH3 Gels for Kubas-Type Hydrogen Storage

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages 4765-4771

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cm402853k

Keywords

hydrogen storage; hydrogen adsorption; homoleptic hydride

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. University of Windsor
  3. University of South Wales, Birmingham Science City
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the United Kingdom
  5. EPSRC [EP/J016454/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J016454/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of an efficient hydrogen storage material has so far hindered the implementation of hydrogen as an energy vector, that is, a substance that allows the transfer through space and time of a certain quantity of energy from its original source. This work presents porous Ti(III) hydride gels as a promising new hydrogen storage material, exploiting the first example of a solid-state homoleptic metal hydride that binds further H-2 ligands using the Kubas interaction. These materials use bridging hydride ligands as an ultralightweight structural feature to support a microporous network of Ti binding sites for molecular H-2 chemisorption. High-pressure Raman spectroscopy confirmed the first evidence of TiH5 and TiH7 species, in some ways analogous to hypervalent MH5 and MH7 (M = Si, Ge, Sn) species. The material with the highest capacity has an excess reversible storage of 3.49 wt % at 140 bar and 298 K without saturation, corresponding to a volumetric density of 44.3 kg/m(3), comparable to the DOE 2017 volumetric system goal of 40 kgH(2)/m(3). However, extrapolations show that the phase-pure material is capable of binding at least 6 wt % hydrogen reversibly at room temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available