3.8 Article

Metal contents and fractionation in contaminated soil after column leaching using [S, S]-EDDS

Journal

CHEMICAL SPECIATION AND BIOAVAILABILITY
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 247-255

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3184/095422910X12894943294346

Keywords

column leaching; contaminated soil; heavy metals; fractionation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20607010]
  2. National Key R&D Technology Program [2006BAJ08B01]
  3. Key Special Program on the S&T for the Pollution Control and Treatment of Water Bodies [2008ZX07316-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Column leaching using [S,S]-ethylene diamine disuccinate ([S, S]-EDDS) on copper tailing soils was carried out to investigate metal content and fractionation after leaching. The soil column was divided into four layers after leaching. Fractionation of Cu, Pb, Zn, and Mn in soil was analyzed using a modified BCR sequential extraction method. Metal contents (Cu, Pb, Ca, Mn) in soil layers increased with the depth of the soil column after leaching in the ES, SE-EDDS treatment. The cumulative extraction efficiency was approximately 43.1% for Cu, 26.8% for Zn, 19.5% for Pb, 10.5% for Ca, 2.07% for Mg, 58.5% for Mn, and 7.92% for Fe. The removal of the reducible fractions of Cu and Mn and the exchangeable fraction of Zn was the most significant in the treatment with [S, S]-EDDS. The exchangeable fraction of Pb was the main fraction that was affected by leaching using [S, S]-EDDS. Distribution of Cu and Mn were severely modified by leaching with [S, S]-EDDS. Percentages of residual fractions of the tested heavy metals in the treatment with [S, S]-EDDS after leaching were much higher than that in the control. Although column leaching using [S, S]-EDDS could remove target metals effectively and impaired their availability, it also dissolved large amounts of major elements and modified the distribution of Mn appreciably.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available