4.5 Article

Chemosensory Exploration of Male Scent by Female Rock Lizards Result from Multiple Chemical Signals of Males

Journal

CHEMICAL SENSES
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 47-54

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr064

Keywords

chemical signals; lizards; mate choice; multiple signals; sexual selection

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [MCI-CGL2008-02119/BOS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sexual signals may convey information on males' quality. However, most research focused on visual signals, ignoring chemical signals. In vertebrates, chemical signals are probably often a multicomponent mixture of several active compounds, but they are not well known. We examined the potential additive and interactive effects of 2 compounds (oleic acid and ergosterol) naturally found in femoral gland secretions of male rock lizards on chemosensory exploration behavior of females. Tongue-flick (TF) rates of females to male secretions may result from the combination of responses to multiple compounds. There may be an additive or synergetic effect because male secretions with the highest proportions of both compounds received the highest TF rates, suggesting that their scents were more intriguing. However, there might be an interactive effect too; female TF rates were higher to males' scent with high proportions of ergosterol alone, even if proportions of oleic acid were low, than to high proportions of oleic acid but with low proportions of ergosterol. Further bioassays testing TF behavior of females to standard compounds, presented alone or combined in different concentrations confirmed these findings. Variations in female TF behavior might be explained because different compounds signal different male traits of different importance for females. Our study suggested that femoral secretion of male rock lizards may act as a multicomponent chemical signal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available