4.5 Article

Surface plasmon assisted electron acceleration in photoemission from gold nanopillars

Journal

CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages 106-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.03.013

Keywords

Photoelectron emission; Plasmon field enhancement; Electron acceleration; Few-cycle pulses

Funding

  1. NSF Division of Chemistry [CHE-0742662]
  2. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division of the U.S. Department of Energys Office of Basic Energy Sciences (DOE-BES) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. DOE-BES Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division
  4. AFOSR-MURI program [FA95500410242]
  5. Department of Defense National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship (NSSEFF)
  6. Max-Planck Research Group grant
  7. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation fellowship
  8. Division Of Chemistry
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1049946] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron photoemission from lithographically prepared gold nanopillars using few-cycle, 800 nm laser pulses is measured. Electron kinetic energies are observed that are higher by up to tens of eV compared to photoemission from a flat gold surface at the same laser intensities. In addition, ionization from the nanopillar sample scales like a two-photon process, while three photons are needed to overcome the work function taking into account the shortest wavelength within the laser bandwidth. A classical electron acceleration model consisting of nonlinear ionization followed by field acceleration qualitatively reproduces the electron kinetic energy data and suggests average enhanced electric fields due to the nanopillars that are between 25 and 39 times greater than the experimentally used laser fields. Implications for plasmon-enhanced attosecond streaking are discussed. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available