4.6 Article

Separation of CsCl from a ternary CsCl-LiCl-KCl salt via a melt crystallization technique for pyroprocessing waste minimization

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 258-263

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.012

Keywords

Crystallization; Separations; Batch; Parameter identification; Pyroprocessing; Fission Products

Funding

  1. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program of Idaho National Laboratory
  2. Center for Advanced Energy Studies, under the Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office [DE-AC07-051D14517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A parametric study has been conducted to identify the effects of several parameters on the separation of CsCl from molten LiCl-KCl salt via a melt crystallization process. A reverse vertical Bridgman technique was used to grow the salt ingots. The investigated parameters were: (1) the advancement rate, (2) the crucible lid configuration, (3) the amount of salt mixture, (4) the initial composition of CsCl, and (5) the temperature difference between the high and low furnace zones. From each grown salt ingot, samples were taken axially and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Results show that CsCl concentrations at the top of the ingots were low and increased to a maximum at the bottom of the salt. Salt (LiCl-KCl) recycle percentages for the experiments ranged from 50% to 75% and the CsCl composition in the waste salt was low. To increase the recycle percentage and the concentration of CsCl in the waste form, multiple crystallization stages were explored showing that they were practical under the optimal experimental conditions at 5.0 mm/h rate with a lid configuration and temperature difference of 200 degrees C for a total of five crystallization stages. Up to 88% of the LiCl-KCl salt can be recycled under these proposed conditions. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available